Hi Dmitri,
I was getting 8 - 10 MB/s on the gluster mount before the changes, which was really slow and the VMs where sluggish and impractical to use.
After the changes, I am getting 70 MB/s which is the expected considering I am using 1 Gbit network for the storage.
The VMs also became way more responsive and are giving a normal user experience.
For a quick test on the mount point on the host I am using:
dd if=/dev/zero of=testfile bs=1M count=1024 oflag=direct
dd if=/dev/zero of=testfile bs=1M count=1024 oflag=direct
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 7:27 PM, Dmitri Chebotarov <4dimach@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi AbiCan you please share your current transfer speeds after you made the change?Thank you.On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Ben Turner <bturner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:----- Original Message -----
> From: "Abi Askushi" <rightkicktech@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Ben Turner" <bturner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhananj@xxxxxxxxxx>, "gluster-user" <gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 1:40:42 AM
> Subject: Re: Slow performance of gluster volume
>
> Did not upgrade yet gluster. I am still using 3.8.12. Only the mentioned
> changes did provide the performance boost.
>
> From which version to which version did you see such performance boost? I
> will try to upgrade and check difference also.
Unfortunately I didn't record the package versions, I also may have done the same thing as you :)
-b
>
> On Sep 11, 2017 2:45 AM, "Ben Turner" <bturner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Great to hear!
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Abi Askushi" <rightkicktech@xxxxxxxxx>
> > To: "Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhananj@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: "gluster-user" <gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Friday, September 8, 2017 7:01:00 PM
> > Subject: Re: Slow performance of gluster volume
> >
> > Following changes resolved the perf issue:
> >
> > Added the option
> > /etc/glusterfs/glusterd.vol :
> > option rpc-auth-allow-insecure on
>
> Was it this setting or was it the gluster upgrade, do you know for sure?
> It may be helpful to others to know for sure(Im interested too:).
>
> -b
>
> >
> > restarted glusterd
> >
> > Then set the volume option:
> > gluster volume set vms server.allow-insecure on
> >
> > I am reaching now the max network bandwidth and performance of VMs is
> quite
> > good.
> >
> > Did not upgrade the glusterd.
> >
> > As a next try I am thinking to upgrade gluster to 3.12 + test libgfapi
> > integration of qemu by upgrading to ovirt 4.1.5 and check vm perf.
> >
> >
> > On Sep 6, 2017 1:20 PM, "Abi Askushi" < rightkicktech@xxxxxxxxx > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > I tried to follow step from
> > https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage to install latest
> > gluster on the first node.
> > It installed 3.10 and not 3.11. I am not sure how to install 3.11 without
> > compiling it.
> > Then when tried to start the gluster on the node the bricks were reported
> > down (the other 2 nodes have still 3.8). No sure why. The logs were
> showing
> > the below (even after rebooting the server):
> >
> > [2017-09-06 10:56:09.023777] E [rpcsvc.c:557:rpcsvc_check_and_reply_error]
> > 0-rpcsvc: rpc actor failed to complete successfully
> > [2017-09-06 10:56:09.024122] E [server-helpers.c:395:server_alloc_frame]
> > (-->/lib64/libgfrpc.so.0(rpcsvc_handle_rpc_call+0x325) [0x7f2d0ec20905]
> > -->/usr/lib64/glusterfs/3.10.5/xlator/protocol/server.so(+0x 3006b)
> > [0x7f2cfa4bf06b]
> > -->/usr/lib64/glusterfs/3.10.5/xlator/protocol/server.so(+0x db34)
> > [0x7f2cfa49cb34] ) 0-server: invalid argument: client [Invalid argument]
> >
> > Do I need to upgrade all nodes before I attempt to start the gluster
> > services?
> > I reverted the first node back to 3.8 at the moment and all restored.
> > Also tests with eager lock disabled did not make any difference.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Krutika Dhananjay < kdhananj@xxxxxxxxxx >
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Do you see any improvement with 3.11.1 as that has a patch that improves
> perf
> > for this kind of a workload
> >
> > Also, could you disable eager-lock and check if that helps? I see that max
> > time is being spent in acquiring locks.
> >
> > -Krutika
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Abi Askushi < rightkicktech@xxxxxxxxx >
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Krutika,
> >
> > Is it anything in the profile indicating what is causing this bottleneck?
> In
> > case i can collect any other info let me know.
> >
> > Thanx
> >
> > On Sep 5, 2017 13:27, "Abi Askushi" < rightkicktech@xxxxxxxxx > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Krutika,
> >
> > Attached the profile stats. I enabled profiling then ran some dd tests.
> Also
> > 3 Windows VMs are running on top this volume but did not do any stress
> > testing on the VMs. I have left the profiling enabled in case more time is
> > needed for useful stats.
> >
> > Thanx
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Krutika Dhananjay < kdhananj@xxxxxxxxxx >
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > OK my understanding is that with preallocated disks the performance with
> and
> > without shard will be the same.
> >
> > In any case, please attach the volume profile[1], so we can see what else
> is
> > slowing things down.
> >
> > -Krutika
> >
> > [1] -
> > https://gluster.readthedocs.io/en/latest/Administrator%
> 20Guide/Monitoring%20Workload/#running-glusterfs-volume-prof ile-command
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Abi Askushi < rightkicktech@xxxxxxxxx >
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Krutika,
> >
> > I already have a preallocated disk on VM.
> > Now I am checking performance with dd on the hypervisors which have the
> > gluster volume configured.
> >
> > I tried also several values of shard-block-size and I keep getting the
> same
> > low values on write performance.
> > Enabling client-io-threads also did not have any affect.
> >
> > The version of gluster I am using is glusterfs 3.8.12 built on May 11 2017
> > 18:46:20.
> > The setup is a set of 3 Centos 7.3 servers and ovirt 4.1, using gluster as
> > storage.
> >
> > Below are the current settings:
> >
> >
> > Volume Name: vms
> > Type: Replicate
> > Volume ID: 4513340d-7919-498b-bfe0-d836b5cea40b
> > Status: Started
> > Snapshot Count: 0
> > Number of Bricks: 1 x (2 + 1) = 3
> > Transport-type: tcp
> > Bricks:
> > Brick1: gluster0:/gluster/vms/brick
> > Brick2: gluster1:/gluster/vms/brick
> > Brick3: gluster2:/gluster/vms/brick (arbiter)
> > Options Reconfigured:
> > server.event-threads: 4
> > client.event-threads: 4
> > performance.client-io-threads: on
> > features.shard-block-size: 512MB
> > cluster.granular-entry-heal: enable
> > performance.strict-o-direct: on
> > network.ping-timeout: 30
> > storage.owner-gid: 36
> > storage.owner-uid: 36
> > user.cifs: off
> > features.shard: on
> > cluster.shd-wait-qlength: 10000
> > cluster.shd-max-threads: 8
> > cluster.locking-scheme: granular
> > cluster.data-self-heal-algorithm: full
> > cluster.server-quorum-type: server
> > cluster.quorum-type: auto
> > cluster.eager-lock: enable
> > network.remote-dio: off
> > performance.low-prio-threads: 32
> > performance.stat-prefetch: on
> > performance.io-cache: off
> > performance.read-ahead: off
> > performance.quick-read: off
> > transport.address-family: inet
> > performance.readdir-ahead: on
> > nfs.disable: on
> > nfs.export-volumes: on
> >
> >
> > I observed that when testing with dd if=/dev/zero of=testfile bs=1G
> count=1 I
> > get 65MB/s on the vms gluster volume (and the network traffic between the
> > servers reaches ~ 500Mbps), while when testing with dd if=/dev/zero
> > of=testfile bs=1G count=1 oflag=direct I get a consistent 10MB/s and the
> > network traffic hardly reaching 100Mbps.
> >
> > Any other things one can do?
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 5:57 AM, Krutika Dhananjay < kdhananj@xxxxxxxxxx >
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > I'm assuming you are using this volume to store vm images, because I see
> > shard in the options list.
> >
> > Speaking from shard translator's POV, one thing you can do to improve
> > performance is to use preallocated images.
> > This will at least eliminate the need for shard to perform multiple steps
> as
> > part of the writes - such as creating the shard and then writing to it and
> > then updating the aggregated file size - all of which require one network
> > call each, which further get blown up once they reach AFR (replicate) into
> > many more network calls.
> >
> > Second, I'm assuming you're using the default shard block size of 4MB (you
> > can confirm this using `gluster volume get <VOL> shard-block-size`). In
> our
> > tests, we've found that larger shard sizes perform better. So maybe change
> > the shard-block-size to 64MB (`gluster volume set <VOL> shard-block-size
> > 64MB`).
> >
> > Third, keep stat-prefetch enabled. We've found that qemu sends quite a
> lot of
> > [f]stats which can be served from the (md)cache to improve performance. So
> > enable that.
> >
> > Also, could you also enable client-io-threads and see if that improves
> > performance?
> >
> > Which version of gluster are you using BTW?
> >
> > -Krutika
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 4:32 AM, Abi Askushi < rightkicktech@xxxxxxxxx >
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have a gluster volume used to host several VMs (managed through oVirt).
> > The volume is a replica 3 with arbiter and the 3 servers use 1 Gbit
> network
> > for the storage.
> >
> > When testing with dd (dd if=/dev/zero of=testfile bs=1G count=1
> oflag=direct)
> > out of the volume (e.g. writing at /root/) the performance of the dd is
> > reported to be ~ 700MB/s, which is quite decent. When testing the dd on
> the
> > gluster volume I get ~ 43 MB/s which way lower from the previous. When
> > testing with dd the gluster volume, the network traffic was not exceeding
> > 450 Mbps on the network interface. I would expect to reach near 900 Mbps
> > considering that there is 1 Gbit of bandwidth available. This results
> having
> > VMs with very slow performance (especially on their write operations).
> >
> > The full details of the volume are below. Any advise on what can be
> tweaked
> > will be highly appreciated.
> >
> > Volume Name: vms
> > Type: Replicate
> > Volume ID: 4513340d-7919-498b-bfe0-d836b5cea40b
> > Status: Started
> > Snapshot Count: 0
> > Number of Bricks: 1 x (2 + 1) = 3
> > Transport-type: tcp
> > Bricks:
> > Brick1: gluster0:/gluster/vms/brick
> > Brick2: gluster1:/gluster/vms/brick
> > Brick3: gluster2:/gluster/vms/brick (arbiter)
> > Options Reconfigured:
> > cluster.granular-entry-heal: enable
> > performance.strict-o-direct: on
> > network.ping-timeout: 30
> > storage.owner-gid: 36
> > storage.owner-uid: 36
> > user.cifs: off
> > features.shard: on
> > cluster.shd-wait-qlength: 10000
> > cluster.shd-max-threads: 8
> > cluster.locking-scheme: granular
> > cluster.data-self-heal-algorithm: full
> > cluster.server-quorum-type: server
> > cluster.quorum-type: auto
> > cluster.eager-lock: enable
> > network.remote-dio: off
> > performance.low-prio-threads: 32
> > performance.stat-prefetch: off
> > performance.io-cache: off
> > performance.read-ahead: off
> > performance.quick-read: off
> > transport.address-family: inet
> > performance.readdir-ahead: on
> > nfs.disable: on
> > nfs.export-volumes: on
> >
> >
> > Thanx,
> > Alex
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-users mailing list
> > Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-users mailing list
> > Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
