Re: VM going down

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Il 11/05/2017 16:15, Pranith Kumar Karampuri ha scritto:
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 7:19 PM, Alessandro Briosi <ab1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Il 11/05/2017 14:09, Niels de Vos ha scritto:
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 12:35:42PM +0530, Krutika Dhananjay wrote:
Niels,

Allesandro's configuration does not have shard enabled. So it has
definitely not got anything to do with shard not supporting seek fop.
Yes, but in case sharding would have been enabled, the seek FOP would be
handled correctly (detected as not supported at all).

I'm still not sure how arbiter prevents doing shards though. We normally
advise to use sharding *and* (optional) arbiter for VM workloads,
arbiter without sharding has not been tested much. In addition, the seek
functionality is only available in recent kernels, so there has been
little testing on CentOS or similar enterprise Linux distributions.

Where is stated that arbiter should be used with sharding?

This information is inaccurate. arbiter can be used independent of sharding.

Thanks, this reassures me I do have a supported setup.

Alessandro
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux