2017-05-01 20:08 GMT+02:00 Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx>: > Filename can be renamed and then we lost the link because hash will be > different. Anyways all these kinds of problems are already solved in > distribute layer. Filename can be renamed even with the current architecture. How do you change the GFID after file rename ? In the same way you can re-hash the file. > I am sorry at the moment with the given information I am not able to wrap my > head around the solution you are trying to suggest :-(. mine was just a POC. tl;dr: if you can save a mapping between files and brick, inside the gluster cluster, you'll get much more flexibility, no SPOF and no need for dedicated metadata servers. > At the moment, brick-splitting, inversion of afr/dht has some merit in my > mind, with tilt towards any solution that avoids this inversion and still > get the desired benefits. What is brick-splitting ? Any docs about this ? _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
