Il 06/04/2017 14:08, Pavel Szalbot ha scritto: > Hi, does your stack support MC-LAG (multichassis link aggregation > group)? If so, configure LAGs with interfaces on both switches and you > should be fine. Yes it does, and I thought on using it too, but then all the ports should be redundant (not only the ones I decide) This are 2x48 ports switches so I basically would be loosing something like 35 ports 'cause most of the connected hosts do not have bonded network cards. This switches also support staking (so to see it as 1 single switch with a special cable), which basically is pretty cool, central configuration, bonding across the switches, etc) The problem here is that if 1 switch goes crazy it will block the other switch too (so not redundant). This happened to me on another installation where 1 switch blocked the whole stack, so redundancy wasn't working as expected. I also tought about using OSPF between the hosts though it seems rather complicated to setup (or at least too much for a 3 host cluster) Should also be possible with VRRP but I'm not sure how to set it up. Alessandro _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
