Hi, does your stack support MC-LAG (multichassis link aggregation group)? If so, configure LAGs with interfaces on both switches and you should be fine. -ps On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Alessandro Briosi <ab1@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi all, > a feature that would really be nice is network redundance. > > In a current installation I have 3 servers with 2 switches (staked with > 10gb uplink). The servers contain VM. > > I have configured the hosts to comunicate through the first switch, but > what happens is the switch goes down? Probably the VM would shutdown as > the quorum is not available at any host. > > Is there a way to make it to switch automatically on a the backup link > on the second switch ? (The hosts right now have bonding interfaces with > LACP on the switches, bond0 -> switch1, bond1 -> switch2) > I tried using balance-alb across the 2 switches but as the hosts are 3 > there's no balance at all... > > A bond of a bond is not possible AFAIK, but I'd like to have something > similar. > > It would be nice to have something like iSCSI multipath or at least an > active/backup network for the storage. > > Anybody has a suggestion on how to solve this right now? > > Thanks, > Alessandro > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
