Hi,
I was able to add bricks to the volume successfully.
Client was reading, writing and listing data from mount point.
But after adding bricks I had issues in folder listing (not listing all folders or returning empty folder list) and write was interrupted.
remounting volume has solved the issue and now working fine.
I was under the impression that running rebalance would cause folder listing issue but now adding brick itself created a problem.
It's irrelevant whether client busy or idle need to remount to solve the issue.
Also, i would like to know using brick in a volume without fix-layout cause folder listing slowness.
Below a snippet of log from client when this happened. let me know if you any more additional info.
Client and Servers are 3.10.1, volume mounted thru fuse.
Machine busy downloading & uploading
[2017-04-05 13:39:33.487176] I [MSGID: 114021] [client.c:2361:notify] 0-gfs-vol-client-1107: current graph is no longer active, destroying rpc_client
[2017-04-05 13:39:33.487196] I [MSGID: 114021] [client.c:2361:notify] 0-gfs-vol-client-1108: current graph is no longer active, destroying rpc_client
[2017-04-05 13:39:33.487201] I [MSGID: 114018] [client.c:2276:client_rpc_notify] 0-gfs-vol-client-1107: disconnected from gfs-vol-client-1107. Client process will keep trying to connect to glusterd until brick's port is available
[2017-04-05 13:39:33.487212] I [MSGID: 114021] [client.c:2361:notify] 0-gfs-vol-client-1109: current graph is no longer active, destroying rpc_client
[2017-04-05 13:39:33.487217] I [MSGID: 114018] [client.c:2276:client_rpc_notify] 0-gfs-vol-client-1108: disconnected from gfs-vol-client-1108. Client process will keep trying to connect to glusterd until brick's port is available
[2017-04-05 13:39:33.487232] I [MSGID: 114018] [client.c:2276:client_rpc_notify] 0-gfs-vol-client-1109: disconnected from gfs-vol-client-1109. Client process will keep trying to connect to glusterd until brick's port is available
Idle system
2017-04-05 13:40:07.692336] I [MSGID: 114035] [client-handshake.c:202:client_set_lk_version_cbk] 2-gfs-vol-client-1065: Server lk version = 1
[2017-04-05 13:40:07.692383] I [MSGID: 114035] [client-handshake.c:202:client_set_lk_version_cbk] 2-gfs-vol-client-995: Server lk version = 1
[2017-04-05 13:40:07.692430] I [MSGID: 114035] [client-handshake.c:202:client_set_lk_version_cbk] 2-gfs-vol-client-965: Server lk version = 1
[2017-04-05 13:40:07.692485] I [MSGID: 114035] [client-handshake.c:202:client_set_lk_version_cbk] 2-gfs-vol-client-1075: Server lk version = 1
[2017-04-05 13:40:07.692532] I [MSGID: 114035] [client-handshake.c:202:client_set_lk_version_cbk] 2-gfs-vol-client-1025: Server lk version = 1
[2017-04-05 13:40:07.692569] I [MSGID: 114035] [client-handshake.c:202:client_set_lk_version_cbk] 2-gfs-vol-client-1055: Server lk version = 1
[2017-04-05 13:40:07.692620] I [MSGID: 114035] [client-handshake.c:202:client_set_lk_version_cbk] 2-gfs-vol-client-955: Server lk version = 1
[2017-04-05 13:40:07.692681] I [MSGID: 114035] [client-handshake.c:202:client_set_lk_version_cbk] 2-gfs-vol-client-1035: Server lk version = 1
[2017-04-05 13:40:07.692870] I [MSGID: 114035] [client-handshake.c:202:client_set_lk_version_cbk] 2-gfs-vol-client-1045: Server lk version = 1
Regards,
Amudhan
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Amudhan P <amudhan83@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I mean time takes for listing folders and files? because of "rebalance fix layout" was not done.On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Amudhan P <amudhan83@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Ok, good to hear.will there be any impact in listing folder and files?.On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On 4 April 2017 at 12:33, Amudhan P <amudhan83@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Hi,I have a query on rebalancing.let's consider following is my folder hierarchy.parent1-fol (parent folder)|_class-fol-1 ( 1 st level subfolder)|_A ( 2 nd level subfolder)|_childfol-1 (child folder created every time before writing files)Now, I have a running cluster with 3.10.1 with disperse volume and I am planning to expand cluster by adding bricks.will there be a problem using newly added bricks without doing a "rebalance fix layout" other than existing files cannot be rebalanced to new brick and files created under existing folder will not go to new brick?.I tested above case in my test setup and observed files created under new folder goes to new brick. and I don't see any issue on listing files and folder.so, My case is we create child folder every time before creating files.The reason to avoid rebalance is I have more than 10000 folders across 1080 bricks. so triggering rebalance will take a long time and in my previous expansion in 3.7 was not able to access some folders randomly until fix layout completes.It sounds like you will not need to run a rebalance or fix-layout for this. It should work fine.Regards,NithyaregardsAmudhan
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
