Re: distribute replicated volume and tons of questions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Maybe but the same server was used for years with ext4 up to about 3 month ago without a single issue

Il 22 feb 2017 10:27 PM, "Ivan Rossi" <rouge2507@xxxxxxxxx> ha scritto:
Isn't it possible that you had  other problems?
I find XFS extremely reliable. I have been using XFS only for more thanhsn a decade and I had a problem once, and it was due to hardware failures a controller...

Il 22/feb/2017 21:19, "Gandalf Corvotempesta" <gandalf.corvotempesta@gmail.com> ha scritto:
2017-02-22 21:16 GMT+01:00 Joe Julian <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> I've been using btrfs for that. In my own tests, btrfs has performed better
> for my use cases.

I had about 7 XFS crashes in 2 month on my backup server.
*every* time i had to run xfs_repair to fix. It took 18hours, the
second time. The first failed due to OOM (16GB)
I don't think you'll be able to run fsck in parallel on 12 disks at
the same time, the server will crash. I also had crashes during an xfs
repair.

No, i'll never use XFS again.
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux