On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Kevin Lemonnier <lemonnierk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On the other hand at home, I tried to use GlusterFS for VM images in a
> simple replica 2 setup with Pacemaker for HA. VMs were constantly
> failing en masse even without making any changes. Very often the images
> got corrupted and had to be restored from backups. This was over a year
> ago but motivated me to try the VMs on MooseFS. Since then I've not had
Yeah, there has been a lot of bad versions for VM, anything < 3.7.12 has
either huge heal problems or random corruption at runtime. That's why
I keep 3.7.12 everywhere, I know it works well at least with my config,
and since I have no use for the new feature why take the risk to update ?
Interesting comments on MooseFS, I've seen it but never tried it yet
because of the single server managing the cluster, seems like a huge
risk. Guess there must be ways to have that role failover or something.
I've locked myself more or less into the version of 3.8 I am running on as well right now as I just don't feel inclined to have to worry if anything in an update will give me issues.
--
Kevin Lemonnier
PGP Fingerprint : 89A5 2283 04A0 E6E9 0111
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
