> > On the other hand at home, I tried to use GlusterFS for VM images in a > simple replica 2 setup with Pacemaker for HA. VMs were constantly > failing en masse even without making any changes. Very often the images > got corrupted and had to be restored from backups. This was over a year > ago but motivated me to try the VMs on MooseFS. Since then I've not had Yeah, there has been a lot of bad versions for VM, anything < 3.7.12 has either huge heal problems or random corruption at runtime. That's why I keep 3.7.12 everywhere, I know it works well at least with my config, and since I have no use for the new feature why take the risk to update ? Interesting comments on MooseFS, I've seen it but never tried it yet because of the single server managing the cluster, seems like a huge risk. Guess there must be ways to have that role failover or something. -- Kevin Lemonnier PGP Fingerprint : 89A5 2283 04A0 E6E9 0111
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
