> > doing so means 3 times cost, 3 times disks to add and manage and so on > is not "commodity" It's the exact same cost. All the clusters have replica 3, there is absolutly no difference in cost if they are separate or not. It's not as easy to manage sure, but it's not like I'm tweaking the conf everyday. > > If you have to create multiple cluster andA not using the scale-out > feature why don't you use drbd or similiar? DRBD 8 doesn't support 3 replicas, and DRBD 9 last time I tried it was basically unusable (well, not surprising for a beta). And on top of that, gluster heals after a network outage is transparent and automatic, DRBD's heal are a huge pain. Since we are using OVH servers, the network really can't be trusted unfortunatly, we do have a lot of heals happening. We use DRBD a lot when we need normal master / slave replication, it's great for that, but to run VMs I really don't like it. One of our client has a proxmox 3 cluster with DRBD 8, everytime there is a little problem with the network it's horrible to fix, compared to gluster. -- Kevin Lemonnier PGP Fingerprint : 89A5 2283 04A0 E6E9 0111
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
