2016-11-12 10:21 GMT+01:00 Kevin Lemonnier <lemonnierk@xxxxxxxxx>: > We've had a lot of problems in the past, but at least for us 3.7.12 (and 3.7.15) > seems to be working pretty well as long as you don't add bricks. We started doing > multiple little clusters and abandonned the idea of one big cluster, had no > issues since :) I was thinking about this. If you meant creating multiple volumes, ok, but having to create multiple clusters is a bad idea. Gluster performs better with multiple nodes, if you have to split the infrastructure (and nodes) in multiple cluster, you'll affect the performance. Is something like to create multiple enterprise SAN to avoid data corruption. Data corruption must be address with firmware/software updates, not by creating multiple storages. if you create 2 gluster storages, you'll get the same issues in multiple storages. It's a bad workaround, not a solution. _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
