Yes. this sounds better than having two separate commands for each tier. If i don't get any other better solution will go with this one. Thanks Atin. ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Atin Mukherjee" <amukherj@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Hari Gowtham" <hgowtham@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "gluster-devel" <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "gluster-users" <gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 4:02:42 PM > Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] New commands for supporting add/remove brick and rebalance on tiered volume > > Hari, > > I think you misunderstood my statement, probably I shouldn't have mentioned > existing semantics. One eg here should clarify it, so this is what I > propose: > > gluster v tier <volname> remove-brick tier-type hot <bricks> start > > Note that my request was to add an argument i.e tier-type here. > > > On Monday 3 October 2016, Hari Gowtham <hgowtham@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi Atin, > > Yes, we can do it. the existing semantics need some changes because of the > > attach tier command (gluster volume tier <VOLNAME> attach <BRICK>...) the > > parsing has to be changed to accommodate the attach tier command. if used > > as I > > mentioned then we can use the functions of attach tier generic for adding > > brick > > also. Other thing with using args is. it needs changes to support the > > keywords > > like replica <count> also. so when we try to make a generic function for > > add > > brick on tiered volume and attach tier these keywords like replica <count> > > and > > tier-type <hot/cold> will need more changes. > > > > So i feel its better to have a separate command instead of the args. > > If i have been missing any pros from having the args let me know. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Atin Mukherjee" <amukherj@xxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>> > > > To: "Hari Gowtham" <hgowtham@xxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>> > > > Cc: "gluster-devel" <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>>, > > "gluster-users" <gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>> > > > Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 2:31:40 PM > > > Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] New commands for supporting add/remove > > brick and rebalance on tiered volume > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Hari Gowtham <hgowtham@xxxxxxxxxx > > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > The current add and remove brick commands aren't sufficient to support > > > > add/remove brick on tiered volumes.So the commands need minor changes > > > > like mentioning which tier we are doing the operation on. So in order > > > > to specify the tier on which we are performing the changes, I thought > > > > of using the following commands for add and remove brick > > > > > > > > adding brick on tiered volume: > > > > gluster volume tier <volname> add-hot-brick/add-cold-brick <brick> ... > > > > <force> > > > > > > > > removing brick on tierd volume: > > > > gluster volume tier <volname> remove-hot-brick/remove-cold-brick > > <brick> > > > > ... <start|stop|status|commit|force> > > > > > > > > I have framed it this way because once we mention details about tiering > > > > these commands become specific to tier and the syntax that we follow > > for > > > > commands are gluster volume component <VOLNAME> ... > > > > So i have made sure that the keyword tier comes after volume. > > > > Need suggestions to make these commands better. > > > > > > > > Similarly once we support add/remove brick we will be having rebalance > > > > commands and the idea is to support rebalance separately for each tier. > > > > So once we will have to rebalance status to display for which we need > > > > rebalance commands specific to tier. so these are the commands we have > > > > thought of: > > > > gluster v tier <VOLNAME> hot-rebalance/cold-rebalance > > <start|stop|status> > > > > > > > > Need your comments regarding this. > > > > > > > > > > Overall it makes sense. Just a comment here. Instead of mentioning > > > remove/add/rebalance-hot/cold-brick can we have an additional arg called > > > tier-type <hot/cold> and continue with the existing semantics like > > > remove-brick, add-brick and rebalance? > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Regards, > > > > Hari. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Gluster-devel mailing list > > > > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;> > > > > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > --Atin > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Hari. > > > > > > -- > --Atin > -- Regards, Hari. _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
