Hi Amudhan, No, bitrot signer is a different process by itself and is not part of brick process. I believe the process 2280 is a brick process ? Did you check with dist-rep volume? Is the same behavior being observed there as well? We need to figure out why brick process is holding that fd for such a long time. Thanks and Regards, Kotresh H R ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Amudhan P" <amudhan83@xxxxxxxxx> > To: "Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar" <khiremat@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 8:15:33 PM > Subject: Re: 3.8.3 Bitrot signature process > > Hi Kotresh, > > As soon as fd closes from brick1 pid, i can see bitrot signature for the > file in brick. > > So, it looks like fd opened by brick process to calculate signature. > > output of the file: > > -rw-r--r-- 2 root root 250M Sep 21 18:32 > /media/disk1/brick1/data/G/test59-bs10M-c100.nul > > getfattr: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names > # file: media/disk1/brick1/data/G/test59-bs10M-c100.nul > trusted.bit-rot.signature=0x010200000000000000e9474e4cc673c0c227a6e807e04aa4ab1f88d3744243950a290869c53daa65df > trusted.bit-rot.version=0x020000000000000057d6af3200012a13 > trusted.ec.config=0x0000080501000200 > trusted.ec.size=0x000000003e800000 > trusted.ec.version=0x0000000000001f400000000000001f40 > trusted.gfid=0x4c091145429448468fffe358482c63e1 > > stat /media/disk1/brick1/data/G/test59-bs10M-c100.nul > File: ‘/media/disk1/brick1/data/G/test59-bs10M-c100.nul’ > Size: 262144000 Blocks: 512000 IO Block: 4096 regular file > Device: 811h/2065d Inode: 402653311 Links: 2 > Access: (0644/-rw-r--r--) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 0/ root) > Access: 2016-09-21 18:34:43.722712751 +0530 > Modify: 2016-09-21 18:32:41.650712946 +0530 > Change: 2016-09-21 19:14:41.698708914 +0530 > Birth: - > > > In other 2 bricks in same set, still signature is not updated for the same > file. > > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 6:48 PM, Amudhan P <amudhan83@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi Kotresh, > > > > I am very sure, No read was going on from mount point. > > > > Again i did same test but after writing data to mount point. I have > > unmounted mount point. > > > > after 120 seconds i am seeing this file fd entry in brick 1 pid > > > > getfattr -m. -e hex -d test59-bs10 > > # file: test59-bs10M-c100.nul > > trusted.bit-rot.version=0x020000000000000057bed574000ed534 > > trusted.ec.config=0x0000080501000200 > > trusted.ec.size=0x000000003e800000 > > trusted.ec.version=0x0000000000001f400000000000001f40 > > trusted.gfid=0x4c091145429448468fffe358482c63e1 > > > > > > ls -l /proc/2280/fd > > lr-x------ 1 root root 64 Sep 21 13:08 19 -> /media/disk1/brick1/. > > glusterfs/4c/09/4c091145-4294-4846-8fff-e358482c63e1 > > > > Volume is a EC - 4+1 > > > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar < > > khiremat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> Hi Amudhan, > >> > >> If you see the ls output, some process has a fd opened in the backend. > >> That is the reason bitrot is not considering for the signing. > >> Could you please observe, after 120 secs of closure of > >> "/media/disk2/brick2/.glusterfs/6e/7c/6e7c49e6-094e-4435- > >> 85bf-f21f99fd8764" > >> the signing happens. If so we need to figure out who holds this fd for > >> such a long time. > >> And also we need to figure is this issue specific to EC volume. > >> > >> Thanks and Regards, > >> Kotresh H R > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> > From: "Amudhan P" <amudhan83@xxxxxxxxx> > >> > To: "Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar" <khiremat@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > Cc: "Gluster Users" <gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 4:56:40 PM > >> > Subject: Re: 3.8.3 Bitrot signature process > >> > > >> > Hi Kotresh, > >> > > >> > > >> > Writing new file. > >> > > >> > getfattr -m. -e hex -d /media/disk2/brick2/data/G/test58-bs10M-c100.nul > >> > getfattr: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names > >> > # file: media/disk2/brick2/data/G/test58-bs10M-c100.nul > >> > trusted.bit-rot.version=0x020000000000000057da8b23000b120e > >> > trusted.ec.config=0x0000080501000200 > >> > trusted.ec.size=0x000000003e800000 > >> > trusted.ec.version=0x0000000000001f400000000000001f40 > >> > trusted.gfid=0x6e7c49e6094e443585bff21f99fd8764 > >> > > >> > > >> > Running ls -l in brick 2 pid > >> > > >> > ls -l /proc/30162/fd > >> > > >> > lr-x------ 1 root root 64 Sep 21 16:22 59 -> > >> > /media/disk2/brick2/.glusterfs/quanrantine > >> > lrwx------ 1 root root 64 Sep 21 16:22 6 -> > >> > /var/lib/glusterd/vols/glsvol1/run/10.1.2.2-media-disk2-brick2.pid > >> > lr-x------ 1 root root 64 Sep 21 16:25 60 -> > >> > /media/disk2/brick2/.glusterfs/6e/7c/6e7c49e6-094e-4435- > >> 85bf-f21f99fd8764 > >> > lr-x------ 1 root root 64 Sep 21 16:22 61 -> > >> > /media/disk2/brick2/.glusterfs/quanrantine > >> > > >> > > >> > find /media/disk2/ -samefile > >> > /media/disk2/brick2/.glusterfs/6e/7c/6e7c49e6-094e-4435- > >> 85bf-f21f99fd8764 > >> > /media/disk2/brick2/.glusterfs/6e/7c/6e7c49e6-094e-4435- > >> 85bf-f21f99fd8764 > >> > /media/disk2/brick2/data/G/test58-bs10M-c100.nul > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar < > >> > khiremat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > > >> > > Hi Amudhan, > >> > > > >> > > Don't grep for the filename, glusterfs maintains hardlink in > >> .glusterfs > >> > > directory > >> > > for each file. Just check 'ls -l /proc/<respective brick pid>/fd' for > >> any > >> > > fds opened > >> > > for a file in .glusterfs and check if it's the same file. > >> > > > >> > > Thanks and Regards, > >> > > Kotresh H R > >> > > > >> > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> > > > From: "Amudhan P" <amudhan83@xxxxxxxxx> > >> > > > To: "Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar" <khiremat@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > > > Cc: "Gluster Users" <gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > > > Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 1:33:10 PM > >> > > > Subject: Re: 3.8.3 Bitrot signature process > >> > > > > >> > > > Hi Kotresh, > >> > > > > >> > > > i have used below command to verify any open fd for file. > >> > > > > >> > > > "ls -l /proc/*/fd | grep filename". > >> > > > > >> > > > as soon as write completes there no open fd's, if there is any > >> alternate > >> > > > option. please let me know will also try that. > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Also, below is my scrub status in my test setup. number of skipped > >> files > >> > > > slow reducing day by day. I think files are skipped due to bitrot > >> > > signature > >> > > > process is not completed yet. > >> > > > > >> > > > where can i see scrub skipped files? > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Volume name : glsvol1 > >> > > > > >> > > > State of scrub: Active (Idle) > >> > > > > >> > > > Scrub impact: normal > >> > > > > >> > > > Scrub frequency: daily > >> > > > > >> > > > Bitrot error log location: /var/log/glusterfs/bitd.log > >> > > > > >> > > > Scrubber error log location: /var/log/glusterfs/scrub.log > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > ========================================================= > >> > > > > >> > > > Node: localhost > >> > > > > >> > > > Number of Scrubbed files: 1644 > >> > > > > >> > > > Number of Skipped files: 1001 > >> > > > > >> > > > Last completed scrub time: 2016-09-20 11:59:58 > >> > > > > >> > > > Duration of last scrub (D:M:H:M:S): 0:0:39:26 > >> > > > > >> > > > Error count: 0 > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > ========================================================= > >> > > > > >> > > > Node: 10.1.2.3 > >> > > > > >> > > > Number of Scrubbed files: 1644 > >> > > > > >> > > > Number of Skipped files: 1001 > >> > > > > >> > > > Last completed scrub time: 2016-09-20 10:50:00 > >> > > > > >> > > > Duration of last scrub (D:M:H:M:S): 0:0:38:17 > >> > > > > >> > > > Error count: 0 > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > ========================================================= > >> > > > > >> > > > Node: 10.1.2.4 > >> > > > > >> > > > Number of Scrubbed files: 981 > >> > > > > >> > > > Number of Skipped files: 1664 > >> > > > > >> > > > Last completed scrub time: 2016-09-20 12:38:01 > >> > > > > >> > > > Duration of last scrub (D:M:H:M:S): 0:0:35:19 > >> > > > > >> > > > Error count: 0 > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > ========================================================= > >> > > > > >> > > > Node: 10.1.2.1 > >> > > > > >> > > > Number of Scrubbed files: 1263 > >> > > > > >> > > > Number of Skipped files: 1382 > >> > > > > >> > > > Last completed scrub time: 2016-09-20 11:57:21 > >> > > > > >> > > > Duration of last scrub (D:M:H:M:S): 0:0:37:17 > >> > > > > >> > > > Error count: 0 > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > ========================================================= > >> > > > > >> > > > Node: 10.1.2.2 > >> > > > > >> > > > Number of Scrubbed files: 1644 > >> > > > > >> > > > Number of Skipped files: 1001 > >> > > > > >> > > > Last completed scrub time: 2016-09-20 11:59:25 > >> > > > > >> > > > Duration of last scrub (D:M:H:M:S): 0:0:39:18 > >> > > > > >> > > > Error count: 0 > >> > > > > >> > > > ========================================================= > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Thanks > >> > > > Amudhan > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar < > >> > > > khiremat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > Hi Amudhan, > >> > > > > > >> > > > > I don't think it's the limitation with read data from the brick. > >> > > > > To limit the usage of CPU, throttling is done using token bucket > >> > > > > algorithm. The log message showed is related to it. But even then > >> > > > > I think it should not take 12 minutes for check-sum calculation > >> unless > >> > > > > there is an fd open (might be internal). Could you please cross > >> verify > >> > > > > if there are any fd opened on that file by looking into /proc? I > >> will > >> > > > > also test it out in the mean time and get back to you. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Thanks and Regards, > >> > > > > Kotresh H R > >> > > > > > >> > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> > > > > > From: "Amudhan P" <amudhan83@xxxxxxxxx> > >> > > > > > To: "Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar" <khiremat@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > > > > > Cc: "Gluster Users" <gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 3:19:28 PM > >> > > > > > Subject: Re: 3.8.3 Bitrot signature process > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Hi Kotresh, > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Please correct me if i am wrong, Once a file write completes > >> and as > >> > > soon > >> > > > > as > >> > > > > > closes fds, bitrot waits for 120 seconds and starts hashing and > >> > > update > >> > > > > > signature for the file in brick. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > But, what i am feeling that bitrot takes too much of time to > >> complete > >> > > > > > hashing. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > below is test result i would like to share. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > writing data in below path using dd : > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > /mnt/gluster/data/G (mount point) > >> > > > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 10M Sep 20 12:19 test53-bs10M-c1.nul > >> > > > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 100M Sep 20 12:19 test54-bs10M-c10.nul > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > No any other write or read process is going on. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Checking file data in one of the brick. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > -rw-r--r-- 2 root root 2.5M Sep 20 12:23 test53-bs10M-c1.nul > >> > > > > > -rw-r--r-- 2 root root 25M Sep 20 12:23 test54-bs10M-c10.nul > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > file's stat and getfattr info from brick, after write process > >> > > completed. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > gfstst-node5:/media/disk2/brick2/data/G$ stat > >> test53-bs10M-c1.nul > >> > > > > > File: ‘test53-bs10M-c1.nul’ > >> > > > > > Size: 2621440 Blocks: 5120 IO Block: 4096 > >> regular > >> > > file > >> > > > > > Device: 821h/2081d Inode: 536874168 Links: 2 > >> > > > > > Access: (0644/-rw-r--r--) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 0/ > >> > > root) > >> > > > > > Access: 2016-09-20 12:23:28.798886647 +0530 > >> > > > > > Modify: 2016-09-20 12:23:28.994886646 +0530 > >> > > > > > Change: 2016-09-20 12:23:28.998886646 +0530 > >> > > > > > Birth: - > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > gfstst-node5:/media/disk2/brick2/data/G$ stat > >> test54-bs10M-c10.nul > >> > > > > > File: ‘test54-bs10M-c10.nul’ > >> > > > > > Size: 26214400 Blocks: 51200 IO Block: 4096 > >> regular > >> > > file > >> > > > > > Device: 821h/2081d Inode: 536874169 Links: 2 > >> > > > > > Access: (0644/-rw-r--r--) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 0/ > >> > > root) > >> > > > > > Access: 2016-09-20 12:23:42.902886624 +0530 > >> > > > > > Modify: 2016-09-20 12:23:44.378886622 +0530 > >> > > > > > Change: 2016-09-20 12:23:44.378886622 +0530 > >> > > > > > Birth: - > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > gfstst-node5:/media/disk2/brick2/data/G$ sudo getfattr -m. -e > >> hex -d > >> > > > > > test53-bs10M-c1.nul > >> > > > > > # file: test53-bs10M-c1.nul > >> > > > > > trusted.bit-rot.version=0x020000000000000057daa7b50002e5b4 > >> > > > > > trusted.ec.config=0x0000080501000200 > >> > > > > > trusted.ec.size=0x0000000000a00000 > >> > > > > > trusted.ec.version=0x00000000000000500000000000000050 > >> > > > > > trusted.gfid=0xe2416bd1aae4403c88f44286273bbe99 > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > gfstst-node5:/media/disk2/brick2/data/G$ sudo getfattr -m. -e > >> hex -d > >> > > > > > test54-bs10M-c10.nul > >> > > > > > # file: test54-bs10M-c10.nul > >> > > > > > trusted.bit-rot.version=0x020000000000000057daa7b50002e5b4 > >> > > > > > trusted.ec.config=0x0000080501000200 > >> > > > > > trusted.ec.size=0x0000000006400000 > >> > > > > > trusted.ec.version=0x00000000000003200000000000000320 > >> > > > > > trusted.gfid=0x54e018dd8c5a4bd79e0317729d8a57c5 > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > file's stat and getfattr info from brick, after bitrot signature > >> > > updated. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > gfstst-node5:/media/disk2/brick2/data/G$ stat > >> test53-bs10M-c1.nul > >> > > > > > File: ‘test53-bs10M-c1.nul’ > >> > > > > > Size: 2621440 Blocks: 5120 IO Block: 4096 > >> regular > >> > > file > >> > > > > > Device: 821h/2081d Inode: 536874168 Links: 2 > >> > > > > > Access: (0644/-rw-r--r--) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 0/ > >> > > root) > >> > > > > > Access: 2016-09-20 12:25:31.494886450 +0530 > >> > > > > > Modify: 2016-09-20 12:23:28.994886646 +0530 > >> > > > > > Change: 2016-09-20 12:27:00.994886307 +0530 > >> > > > > > Birth: - > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > gfstst-node5:/media/disk2/brick2/data/G$ sudo getfattr -m. -e > >> hex -d > >> > > > > > test53-bs10M-c1.nul > >> > > > > > # file: test53-bs10M-c1.nul > >> > > > > > trusted.bit-rot.signature=0x0102000000000000006de7493c5c > >> > > > > 90f643357c268fbaaf461c1567e0334e4948023ce17268403aa37a > >> > > > > > trusted.bit-rot.version=0x020000000000000057daa7b50002e5b4 > >> > > > > > trusted.ec.config=0x0000080501000200 > >> > > > > > trusted.ec.size=0x0000000000a00000 > >> > > > > > trusted.ec.version=0x00000000000000500000000000000050 > >> > > > > > trusted.gfid=0xe2416bd1aae4403c88f44286273bbe99 > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > gfstst-node5:/media/disk2/brick2/data/G$ stat > >> test54-bs10M-c10.nul > >> > > > > > File: ‘test54-bs10M-c10.nul’ > >> > > > > > Size: 26214400 Blocks: 51200 IO Block: 4096 > >> regular > >> > > file > >> > > > > > Device: 821h/2081d Inode: 536874169 Links: 2 > >> > > > > > Access: (0644/-rw-r--r--) Uid: ( 0/ root) Gid: ( 0/ > >> > > root) > >> > > > > > Access: 2016-09-20 12:25:47.510886425 +0530 > >> > > > > > Modify: 2016-09-20 12:23:44.378886622 +0530 > >> > > > > > Change: 2016-09-20 12:38:05.954885243 +0530 > >> > > > > > Birth: - > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > gfstst-node5:/media/disk2/brick2/data/G$ sudo getfattr -m. -e > >> hex -d > >> > > > > > test54-bs10M-c10.nul > >> > > > > > # file: test54-bs10M-c10.nul > >> > > > > > trusted.bit-rot.signature=0x010200000000000000394c345f0b > >> > > > > 0c63ee652627a62eed069244d35c4d5134e4f07d4eabb51afda47e > >> > > > > > trusted.bit-rot.version=0x020000000000000057daa7b50002e5b4 > >> > > > > > trusted.ec.config=0x0000080501000200 > >> > > > > > trusted.ec.size=0x0000000006400000 > >> > > > > > trusted.ec.version=0x00000000000003200000000000000320 > >> > > > > > trusted.gfid=0x54e018dd8c5a4bd79e0317729d8a57c5 > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > (Actual time taken for reading file from brick for md5sum) > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > gfstst-node5:/media/disk2/brick2/data/G$ time md5sum > >> > > test53-bs10M-c1.nul > >> > > > > > 8354dcaa18a1ecb52d0895bf00888c44 test53-bs10M-c1.nul > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > real 0m0.045s > >> > > > > > user 0m0.007s > >> > > > > > sys 0m0.003s > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > gfstst-node5:/media/disk2/brick2/data/G$ time md5sum > >> > > > > test54-bs10M-c10.nul > >> > > > > > bed3c0a4a1407f584989b4009e9ce33f test54-bs10M-c10.nul > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > real 0m0.166s > >> > > > > > user 0m0.062s > >> > > > > > sys 0m0.011s > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > As you can see that 'test54-bs10M-c10.nul' file took around 12 > >> > > minutes to > >> > > > > > update bitort signature (pls refer stat output for the file). > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > what would be the cause for such a slow read?. Any limitation > >> in read > >> > > > > data > >> > > > > > from brick? > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Also, i am seeing this line bitd.log, what does this mean? > >> > > > > > [bit-rot.c:1784:br_rate_limit_signer] 0-glsvol1-bit-rot-0: > >> [Rate > >> > > Limit > >> > > > > > Info] "tokens/sec (rate): 131072, maxlimit: 524288 > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks > >> > > > > > Amudhan P > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar < > >> > > > > > khiremat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Hi Amudhan, > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Thanks for testing out the bitrot feature and sorry for the > >> delayed > >> > > > > > > response. > >> > > > > > > Please find the answers inline. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Thanks and Regards, > >> > > > > > > Kotresh H R > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> > > > > > > > From: "Amudhan P" <amudhan83@xxxxxxxxx> > >> > > > > > > > To: "Gluster Users" <gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > > > > > > > Sent: Friday, September 16, 2016 4:14:10 PM > >> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: 3.8.3 Bitrot signature process > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Hi, > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Can anyone reply to this mail. > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Amudhan P < > >> > > amudhan83@xxxxxxxxx > > >> > > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Hi, > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > I am testing bitrot feature in Gluster 3.8.3 with disperse > >> EC > >> > > volume > >> > > > > 4+1. > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > When i write single small file (< 10MB) after 2 seconds i > >> can see > >> > > > > bitrot > >> > > > > > > > signature in bricks for the file, but when i write multiple > >> files > >> > > > > with > >> > > > > > > > different size ( > 10MB) it takes long time (> 24hrs) to see > >> > > bitrot > >> > > > > > > > signature in all the files. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > The default timeout for signing to happen is 120 seconds. > >> So the > >> > > > > > > signing will happen > >> > > > > > > 120 secs after the last fd gets closed on that file. So if > >> the > >> > > file > >> > > > > is > >> > > > > > > being written > >> > > > > > > continuously, it will not be signed until 120 secs after > >> it's > >> > > last > >> > > > > fd is > >> > > > > > > closed. > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > My questions are. > >> > > > > > > > 1. I have enabled scrub schedule as hourly and throttle as > >> > > normal, > >> > > > > does > >> > > > > > > this > >> > > > > > > > make any impact in delaying bitrot signature? > >> > > > > > > No. > >> > > > > > > > 2. other than "bitd.log" where else i can watch current > >> status of > >> > > > > bitrot, > >> > > > > > > > like number of files added for signature and file status? > >> > > > > > > Signature will happen after 120 sec of last fd closure, > >> as > >> > > said > >> > > > > above. > >> > > > > > > There is not status command which tracks the signature > >> of the > >> > > > > files. > >> > > > > > > But there is bitrot status command which tracks the > >> number of > >> > > > > files > >> > > > > > > scrubbed. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > #gluster vol bitrot <volname> scrub status > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > 3. where i can confirm that all the files in the brick are > >> bitrot > >> > > > > signed? > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > As said, signing information of all the files is not > >> tracked. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > 4. is there any file read size limit in bitrot? > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > I didn't get. Could you please elaborate this ? > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > 5. options for tuning bitrot for faster signing of files? > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Bitrot feature is mainly to detect silent corruption > >> > > (bitflips) of > >> > > > > > > files due to long > >> > > > > > > term storage. Hence the default is 120 sec of last fd > >> > > closure, the > >> > > > > > > signing happens. > >> > > > > > > But there is a tune able which can change the default > >> 120 sec > >> > > but > >> > > > > > > that's only for > >> > > > > > > testing purposes and we don't recommend it. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > gluster vol get master features.expiry-time > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > For testing purposes, you can change this default and > >> test. > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Thanks > >> > > > > > > > Amudhan > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > >> > > > > > > > Gluster-users mailing list > >> > > > > > > > Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx > >> > > > > > > > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
