Hi Ravi,
I saw that you updated the patch today (@ http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15289/ ). I built an RPM of the first iteration you had of the patch (just changing the one line in arbiter.c "GF_FREE (ctx->iattbuf);") and am running that on some test servers now to see if the memory of the arbiter brick gets out of control.
Ben
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 3:38 AM, Ravishankar N <ravishankar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Benjamin
On 08/23/2016 06:41 AM, Benjamin Edgar wrote:
I've attached a statedump of the problem brick process. Let me know if there are any other logs you need.
Thanks for the report! I've sent a fix @ http://review.gluster.org/#/c/15289/ . It would be nice if you can verify if the patch fixes the issue for you.
Thanks,
Ravi
Thanks a lot,Ben
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks!Could you collect statedump of the brick process by following: https://gluster.readthedocs.ioThat should help us identify which datatype is causing leaks and fix it./en/latest/Troubleshooting/sta tedump
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 2:22 AM, Benjamin Edgar <benedgar8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
______________________________Hi,
I appear to have a memory leak with a replica 3 arbiter 1 configuration of gluster. I have a data brick and an arbiter brick on one server, and another server with the last data brick. The more I write files to gluster in this configuration, the more memory the arbiter brick process takes up.
I am able to reproduce this issue by first setting up a replica 3 arbiter 1 configuration and then using the following bash script to create 10,000 200kB files, delete those files, and run forever:
while true ; dofor i in {1..10000} ; dodd if=/dev/urandom bs=200K count=1 of=$TEST_FILES_DIR/file$idonerm -rf $TEST_FILES_DIR/*
done
$TEST_FILES_DIR is a location on my gluster mount.
After about 3 days of this script running on one of my clusters, this is what the output of "top" looks like:PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND16039 root 20 0 1397220 77720 3948 S 20.6 1.0 860:01.53 glusterfsd13174 root 20 0 1395824 112728 3692 S 19.6 1.5 806:07.17 glusterfs19961 root 20 0 2967204 2.145g 3896 S 17.3 29.0 752:10.70 glusterfsd
As you can see one of the brick processes is using over 2 gigabytes of memory.
One work-around for this is to kill the arbiter brick process and restart the gluster daemon. This restarts arbiter brick process and its memory usage goes back down to a reasonable level. However I would rather not kill the arbiter brick every week for production environments.
Has anyone seen this issue before and is there a known work-around/fix?
Thanks,Ben
_________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
--
Pranith
--
Benjamin EdgarComputer ScienceUniversity of Virginia 2015(571) 338-0878
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/ mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
Benjamin Edgar
Computer Science
University of Virginia 2015
(571) 338-0878
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users