Hi,
Glusterfs Ver: 3.7.6
1) Currently I am using disperse volume and its performance is not satisfactory.
So I tried "sudo gluster v set ec-vol performance.client-io-threads on"
on the volume . But I am getting
Connection failed. Please check if gluster daemon is operational. error.
volume info
Volume Name: ec-vol
Type: Disperse
Volume ID: 66d9f9e9-8bbd-46d8-b491-5b3e48219ee1
Status: Started
Number of Bricks: 1 x (4 + 2) = 6
Transport-type: tcp
Bricks:
Brick1: jk:/home/jk/gluster/brick1
Brick2: jk:/home/jk/gluster/brick2
Brick3: jk:/home/jk/gluster/brick3
Brick4: jk:/home/jk/gluster/brick4
Brick5: jk:/home/jk/gluster/brick5
Brick6: jk:/home/jk/gluster/brick6
Options Reconfigured:
performance.readdir-ahead: on
Type: Disperse
Volume ID: 66d9f9e9-8bbd-46d8-b491-5b3e48219ee1
Status: Started
Number of Bricks: 1 x (4 + 2) = 6
Transport-type: tcp
Bricks:
Brick1: jk:/home/jk/gluster/brick1
Brick2: jk:/home/jk/gluster/brick2
Brick3: jk:/home/jk/gluster/brick3
Brick4: jk:/home/jk/gluster/brick4
Brick5: jk:/home/jk/gluster/brick5
Brick6: jk:/home/jk/gluster/brick6
Options Reconfigured:
performance.readdir-ahead: on
Attached the log.
How to resolve this error ?
2) If I replace the Erasure code algorithm in the EC with a simpler one , will it give a better performance ? What is the real bottleneck ?
Best Regards
JK
Attachment:
usr-local-etc-glusterfs-glusterd.vol.log-3
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users