Re: to RAID or not?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: to RAID or not?
From: Dmitry Melekhov <dm@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 08:43:04 +0400
In-reply-to: <3C70B1AE-916E-4C37-B930-1E606F98AD9D@sheffield.ac.uk>
References: <CAJH6TXjWHUbBq_VOyc5OnaLdpK8F0ePZcp4heWoWc+kPgPoRXA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJH6TXj75NK2FnbfTjcN0T9Spg-dA-zxPvSMG=t_4N8Guekx9A@mail.gmail.com> <3C70B1AE-916E-4C37-B930-1E606F98AD9D@sheffield.ac.uk>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0

04.07.2016 19:01, Matt Robinson пишет:

With mdadm any raid6 (especially with 12 disks) will be rubbish.

Well, this can be offtopic, but could you, please, explain why? (neverused md raid other than raid1... )


_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

References:
- to RAID or not?
  - From: Gandalf Corvotempesta
- Re: to RAID or not?
  - From: Gandalf Corvotempesta
- Re: to RAID or not?
  - From: Matt Robinson

Prev by Date: Re: to RAID or not?
Next by Date: Gluster Peer behavior
Previous by thread: Re: to RAID or not?
Next by thread: Re: to RAID or not?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Gluster Development] [Linux Filesytems Development] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]

Powered by Linux