Re: Small files performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Il 01 giu 2016 22:34, "Gmail" <b.s.mikhael@xxxxxxxxx> ha scritto:
>
>
>> On Jun 1, 2016, at 1:25 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta <gandalf.corvotempesta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> with nfs replication is made directly by gluster servers with no client involved?
>
> correct

This is good
what i really don't like in gluster is the client doing all the replication.
replication and cluster management should be done directly by servers, not by clients
client side the resources used for replication and cluster management could be used for something else like virtualizations and so on.

> the NFS client talks to only one NFS server (the one which it mounts), the NFS HA setup is only to failover a virtual IP to another healthy node. so the NFS client will just do 3 minor timeouts then it will do a major timeout, when that happens, the virtual IP failover will be already done.

The same is for native client.
even the native client has to wait for a timeout before changing the storage node, right?
what happens to a virtual machine writing to disk during this timeout?

_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux