Re: Small files performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Il 28/05/2016 11:46, Gandalf Corvotempesta ha scritto:

if i remember properly, each stat() on a file needs to be sent to all host in replica to check if are in sync

Is this true for both gluster native client and nfs ganesha?

Which is the best for a shared hosting storage with many millions of small files? About 15.000.000 small files in 800gb ? Or even for Maildir hosting

Ganesha can be configured for HA and loadbalancing so the biggest issue that was present in standard NFS now is gone

Any advantage about native gluster over Ganesha? Removing the fuse requirement should also be a performance advantage for Ganesha over native client


bump
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux