RAID 10 provide best performance (much better than raid 6)
2016-01-13 5:35 GMT+01:00 Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx>:
+gluster-users
On 01/13/2016 09:44 AM, Pawan Devaiah wrote:
If replication is going to be there, why additional RAID10? You can do just RAID6, it saves on space and replication in glusterfs will give redundancy anyways.We would be looking for redundancy so replicated volumes I guess
Pranith
Thanks,Dev
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 01/13/2016 02:21 AM, Pawan Devaiah wrote:
What will be the kind of volume you will be using with these disks?Thanks for the response Pranith
If we take EC out of the equation and say I go with RAID on the physical disk, do you think GlusterFS is good for the 2 workloads that I mentioned before.
Basically it is going to be a NFS storage for VM and data but with different RAIDs, 10 for VM and 6 for data.
Pranith
ThanksDev
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 01/12/2016 01:26 PM, Pawan Devaiah wrote:
EC as it is today is not good for this.Thanks for your response Pranith and Mathieu,
Pranith: To answer your question, I am planning to use this storage for two main workloads.
1. As a shared storage for VMs.
If the above is for storing archive data. EC is nice here.2. As a NFS Storage for files.
Pranith
We are a online backup company so we store few hundred Terra bytes of data.
Mathieu: I appreciate your concern, however as a system admins sometimes we get paranoid and try to control everything under the Sun.I know I can only control what I can.
Having said that, No, I have pair of servers to start with so at the moment I am just evaluating and preparing for proof of concept, after which I am going to propose to my management, if they are happy then we will proceed further.
Regards,Dev
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Mathieu Chateau <mathieu.chateau@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello,
For any system, 36 disks raise disk failure probability. Do you plan GlusterFS with only one server?
You should think about failure at each level and be prepared for it:
- Motherboard failure (full server down)
- Disks failure
- Network cable failure
- File system corruption (time needed for fsck)
- File/folder removed by mistake (backup)
Using or not raid depend on your answer on these questions and performance needed.It also depend how "good" is raid controller in your server, like if it has battery and 1GB of cache.
When many disks are bought at same time (1 order, serial number close to each other), they may fail in near time to each other (if something bad happened in manufactory).I already saw like 3 disks failing in few days.
just my 2 cents,
2016-01-12 4:36 GMT+01:00 Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu@xxxxxxxxxx>:
On 01/12/2016 04:34 AM, Pawan Devaiah wrote:
What is the workload you have?Hi All,
We have a fairly powerful server sitting at office with 128 Gig RAM and 36 X 4 TB drives. I am planning to utilize this server as a backend storage with GlusterFS on it.I have been doing lot of reading on Glusterfs, but I do not see any definite recommendation on having RAID on GLUSTER nodes.Is it recommended to have RAID on GLUSTER nodes specially for the bricks?If Yes, is it not contrary to the latest Erasure code implemented in Gluster or is it still not ready for production environment?I am happy to implement RAID but my two main concern are1. I want to make most of the disk space available.2. I am also concerned about the rebuild time after disk failure on the RAID.
We found in our testing that random read/write workload with Erasure coded volumes is not as good as we get with replication. There are enhancements in progress at the moment to address these things which we are yet to merge and re-test.
Pranith
ThanksDev
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users