On 6 November 2015 at 17:22, Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sure. So far I've just been able to figure that GlusterFS counts blocks in multiples of 512B while XFS seems to count them in multiples of 4.0KB.Let me again try creating sparse files on xfs, sharded and non-sharded gluster volumes and compare the results. I'll let you know what I find.
I repeated the tests with a single gluster brick on a ext4 partition - disk usage (du) and file size were exactly right.
--
Lindsay
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
