Re: Request for user comments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 06/17/2015 09:28 PM, Ravishankar N wrote:
Hello,

I sent a patch [1] to print the backtrace generated by 'gf_log_callingfn' (only) in a human-readable way. While it improves readability by printing every function of the backtrace in a separate line (which is how a backtrace *should* look), it violates the fact that every log in gluster gets logged in a single line. Does anyone see any problem with this? Especially sys-admins who might have scripts/ mechanisms to parse logs? Note that the patch affects only messages logged using gf_log_callingfn() and is avoids eyesore.
Grepping logs will be difficult with this change. May be we can use something like:
sed 's/(-->/\n(-->/g' <logfile.log> to achieve the same?

Pranith

Thanks,
Ravi


[1] http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11217/1
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux