----- Original Message ----- > From: "M S Vishwanath Bhat" <msvbhat@xxxxxxxxx> > To: "Benjamin Turner" <bennyturns@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "Kiran Patil" <kiran@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx, "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx>, > bturner@xxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 3:20:12 AM > Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Gluster Benchmark Kit > > On 28 April 2015 at 01:03, Benjamin Turner <bennyturns@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi Kiran, thanks for the feedback! I already put up a repo on githib: > > > > https://github.com/bennyturns/gluster-bench > > > > On my TODO list is: > > > > -The benchmark is currently RHEL / RHGS(Red Hat Gluster Storage) specific, > > I want to make things work with at least non paid RPM distros and Ubuntu. > > -Other filesystems(like you mentioned) > > -No LVM and non thinp config options. > > -EC, tiering, snapshot capabilities. > > > > I'll probably fork things and have a Red Hat specific version and an > > upstream version. As soon as I have everything working on Centos I'll let > > the list know and we can enhance things to do whatever we need. I always > > thought it would be interesting if we had a page where people could submit > > their benchmark data and the HW / config used. Having a standard tool / > > tool set will help there. > > > > Ben, > > Do you think it is a good Idea (or is it possible) to integrate these with > distaf? (https://github.com/gluster/distaf) When I made this my goal was for someone to be able to build a cluster from scratch and run the full benchmark suite with only like 3-4 commands. I specifically didn't use distaf to cut down on complexity, because the test tools were all already multinode capable, and I am already maintaining the rhs-system-init script I figured I would just reuse that for the setup. That said I have been seeing more and more reasons to move things to distaf(FIO is not multi node capable, gather profiling data from each server, etc), and I was kicking around the idea of DISTAF-ifing it. Let me fix everything to work with Centos/Fedora and get it into git. From there we can look at distaf-ifing things, but I agree that is the way things should go. -b > That would enable us to choose workloads suitable to each scenario for > single (set of) tests. > > Best Regards, > Vishwanath > > > > > > -b > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 3:31 AM, Kiran Patil <kiran@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I came across "Gluster Benchmark Kit" while reading > >> Disastrous performance with rsync to mounted Gluster volume thread. > >> > >> http://54.82.237.211/gluster-benchmark/gluster-bench-README > >> > >> http://54.82.237.211/gluster-benchmark > >> > >> The Kit includes tools such as iozone, smallfile and fio. > >> > >> This Kit is not documented and need to baseline this tool for Gluster > >> Benchmark testing. > >> > >> The community is going to benefit by adopting and extending it as per > >> their needs and the kit should be hosted on Github. > >> > >> The init.sh script in the Kit contains only XFS filesystem which can be > >> extended to BTRFS and ZFS. > >> > >> Thanks Ben Turner for sharing it. > >> > >> Kiran. > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Gluster-devel mailing list > >> Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx > >> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > >> > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Gluster-devel mailing list > > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx > > http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > > > > > _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
