Hi,
My VM disk are based on RAW...
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Samuli Heinonen <samppah@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi!What image type you are using to store virtual machines? For example using sparse QCOW2 images is much slower than preallocated RAW images. Performance with QCOW2 should get better after image file has grown bigger and it's not necessary to resize sparse image anymore.Best regards,Samuli HeinonenOn 13.2.2015, at 8.58, Punit Dambiwal <hypunit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:_______________________________________________Hi,I have seen the gluster performance is dead slow on the small files...even i am using the SSD....it's too bad performance....even i am getting better performance in my SAN with normal SATA disk...I am using distributed replicated glusterfs with replica count=2...i have all SSD disks on the brick...root@vm3:~# dd bs=64k count=4k if=/dev/zero of=test oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 57.3145 s, 4.7 MB/s
root@vm3:~# dd bs=64k count=4k if=/dev/zero of=test conv=fdatasync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 1.80093 s, 149 MB/s
Thanks,
Punit
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
