| Hi!
What image type you are using to store virtual machines? For example using sparse QCOW2 images is much slower than preallocated RAW images. Performance with QCOW2 should get better after image file has grown bigger and it's not necessary to resize sparse image anymore.
Best regards, Samuli Heinonen
Hi,
I have seen the gluster performance is dead slow on the small files...even i am using the SSD....it's too bad performance....even i am getting better performance in my SAN with normal SATA disk...
I am using distributed replicated glusterfs with replica count=2...i have all SSD disks on the brick...
root@vm3:~# dd bs=64k count=4k
if=/dev/zero of=test oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 57.3145
s, 4.7 MB/s
root@vm3:~# dd bs=64k count=4k
if=/dev/zero of=test conv=fdatasync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 1.80093
s, 149 MB/s
Thanks, Punit
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
|
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
