Re: Getting past the basic setup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jorge Garcia" <jgarcia@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 1:24:35 PM
> Subject:  Getting past the basic setup
> 
> 
> We're looking at using glusterfs for some of our storage needs. I have
> read the "Quick start", was able to create a basic filesystem, and that
> all worked. But wow, was it slow! I'm not sure if it was due to our very
> simple setup, or if that's just the way it is. So, we're trying to look
> deeper into options to improve performance, etc. In particular, I'm
> interested in the NUFA scheduler. But after hours of googling around for
> more information, I haven't gotten anywhere. There's a page with
> "translator tutorials", but all the links are dead. Jeff Darcy seems to
> be working at Red Hat these days, so maybe all his open-source stuff got
> removed. I haven't found anything about how to even start setting up a
> NUFA scheduled system. Any pointers of where to even start?

Hi Jorge.  Here are some of my favorite gluster tuning DOCs:

https://rhsummit.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/bengland_h_1100_rhs_performance.pdf
http://rhsummit.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/england_th_0450_rhs_perf_practices-4_neependra.pdf
http://rhsummit.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/england-rhs-performance.pdf

They are all pretty much the same just updated as new features were implemented.  I usually think of gluster perf for sequential workloads like:

writes = 1/2 * NIC bandwidth(when using replica 2) - 20%(with a fast enough back end to service this)

.5 * 1250 - 250 = ~500 MB / sec

reads = NIC bandwidth - 40%

1250 * .7 = ~750 MB / sec

If you aren't seeing between 400-500 MB / sec sequential writes and 600-750 MB / sec sequential reads on 10G NICs with fast enough back end to service this then be sure to tune what is suggested in that DOC.  What is your HW like?  What are your performance requirements?  Just to note, glusterFS performance really starts to degrade when writing in under 64KB block sizes.  What size of files and what record / block size are you writing in?

-b

> Any help would be extremely appreciated!
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jorge
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
> 
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users



[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux