On 11/13/2014 05:13 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 04:31:38PM +0530, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
Folks,
While I was looking into glusterd backlogs I could see there are few BZs
which were marked as "needinfo" on the reporter as the information was
not sufficient enough for further analysis and the reporter hasn't
gotten back with the required details.
Ideally we should close these bugs saying inadequate information,
however I am just wondering should we set a timeline for the waiting
period like 1 or 2 weeks if not more and then close all such instances
to reduce the count.
What do you guys think?
Sounds good to me. I do not care much about the 1 or 2 weeks, lets see
if others have an opinion about it.
When you have some reactions, could you add a paragraph to the Bug
Triage guidelines [1] about this? It would be good to have a link in
there that lists bugs in NEW status, have a NEEDINFO set and their last
update was X weeks ago.
Thanks,
Niels
1. http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Bug_triage
+1 to the idea of closing a bug if we dont get required information in a
stipulated time frame. However I would suggest a more lenient time frame
i.e. at least 4 weeks. That gives ample time for the reporter to
respond. I think 4 weeks are enough even if someone goes for a vacation
after filing the bug :)
Thanks,
Lala
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
