On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 04:31:38PM +0530, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > Folks, > > While I was looking into glusterd backlogs I could see there are few BZs > which were marked as "needinfo" on the reporter as the information was > not sufficient enough for further analysis and the reporter hasn't > gotten back with the required details. > > Ideally we should close these bugs saying inadequate information, > however I am just wondering should we set a timeline for the waiting > period like 1 or 2 weeks if not more and then close all such instances > to reduce the count. > > What do you guys think? Sounds good to me. I do not care much about the 1 or 2 weeks, lets see if others have an opinion about it. When you have some reactions, could you add a paragraph to the Bug Triage guidelines [1] about this? It would be good to have a link in there that lists bugs in NEW status, have a NEEDINFO set and their last update was X weeks ago. Thanks, Niels 1. http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Bug_triage
Attachment:
pgp1q0FxgRKTM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
