On 29 October 2014 12:46, Dan Mons <dmons@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > RAID10 provided no practical benefit. All of Gluster's performance > bottlenecks are related to DHT lookups and clustering over Ethernet. > Speaking specifically for Gluster and in my use case, the disk has > never been the bottlneck. Thats what I suspected. Given I'm using a whitebox setup without hot pluggable bays I feel I'm better off improving my network performance than adding extra drives for RAID. What I'm looking for here is shared storage with redundancy and reasonable performance. I imagine I'm running a smaller, lower spec'd environment with less requirements than most here :) Thanks, _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
