On 29 October 2014 00:43, Juan José Pavlik Salles <jjpavlik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It could be both necessary and recommended, depending on what you want to > achieve. I've gone through a few awkward moments because of not having RAID > in our distribute-replicated volume, but nothing you can't solve shutting > down the node and replacing the drive. RAID will give you transparency and > tolerance to drive failures and is even better if we talk about a good HW > RAID. What about RAID 5, is that possible? I thought RAID5 was no longer considered a good option these days, with RAID10 being preferred? > -- > Pavlik Salles Juan José > Blog - http://viviendolared.blogspot.com -- Lindsay _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
