In glusterfs documentation the recommended mode is the mode=6. My switch (dlink dgs-1510) can be 802.3ad modes, in this case is this better than mode=6 ? Tibor ----- Eredeti üzenet ----- > Indeed. Only the rr (round robin) mode will get higher performance on a > single stream. It also means that packets may be received out-of-order > which can cause retransmissions (so it should never be used for UDP > services like SIP/RTP). AFAIK it only works with Cisco etherchannel and > does not scale well. > > Multiple streams are balanced using the XOR of the two endpoint MAC > addresses in mode 4. This can be changed to include L3 data (eg src/dest > IP) but switch support is again limited for the alternate algo. I know > my kit can't be changed to add L3 data. As long as you have multiple > clients the default mode 4 will scale almost linearly and will be > guaranteed to work across any switch that supports LACP. > > Cheers > > Alex > > On 29/09/14 15:03, Reinis Rozitis wrote: > >> Ok, I mean this is a network based solution, but I think the > >> 100MB/sec is possible with one nic too. > >> I just wondering, maybe my bonding isn't working fine. > > > > You should test with multiple clients/dd streams. > > > > http://serverfault.com/questions/569060/link-aggregation-lacp-802-3ad-max-throughput/ > > > > > > rr > > _______________________________________________ > > Gluster-users mailing list > > Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx > > http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
