On 08/07/2014 11:48 AM, Roman wrote:
How can they be in sync, if they are different in
size ? And why then VM is not able to survive gluster outage? I
really want to use glusterfs in our production for
infrastructure virtualization due to its simple setup, but I'm
not able to at this moment. Maybe you've got some testing
agenda? Or could you list me the steps to make right tests, so
our VM-s would survive the outages.
This is because of sparse files.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sparse_file
This should not happen if you do the writes lets say from
'/dev/urandom' instead of '/dev/zero'
I will provide you with a document for testing this issue properly.
I have a lot going on in my day job so not getting enough time to
write that out. Considering the weekend is approaching I will get a
bit of time definitely over the weekend so I will send you the
document over the weekend.
Pranith
We would like to be sure, that in situation, when one of
storages is down, the VM-s are running - it is OK, we see
this.
We would like to be sure, that data after the server is
back up is synced - we can't see that atm
We would like to be sure, that VMs are failovering to the
second storage during the outage - we can't see this atm
:(
|
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users