Thanks Ravishankar, I've patched and built the package already for RHEL6 and now RHEL5. Also while I was doing this I've noticed that bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1073217 has not been included in 3.4.4 either. I've manually patched my pkg here. Just letting you guys know v On Mon 30 Jun 2014 09:54:21, Ravishankar N wrote: > On 06/30/2014 07:35 AM, Viktor Villafuerte wrote: > >On the same note, I've just got .src RPM for 3.4.4 and the patch is not > >there. From the email trail it seems that it's not officially backported > >to 3.4.4. It is present in the latest GIT release though.. > Yup, like Justin said in a later thread, the patch has been merged in 3.4 > branch and is available 3.4.5 beta1 onwards. Backports happen to a 'branch' > and is available in the subsequent 'release' made off that branch. > >Just to make sure I'm doing the right thing the code change (patch :) is > >only about those 12 lines in 'fuse_getxattr', right? > You can apply http://review.gluster.org/#/c/8164/ manually to the 3.4.4 > source; that should be fine. > >I'm going to manually add it and rebuilt 3.4.4 here at work so I just > >want to make sure I won't miss half the patch or smth... :) > > > >v > > > > > > > >On Tue 24 Jun 2014 18:40:25, Peter Auyeung wrote: > >>Would that be in 3.4.5 or we can apply a patch on 3.4.4? > >> > >>I am planning to deploy a prod on 3.4.4. > >> > >>Thanks > >>Peter > >>________________________________________ > >>From: gluster-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [gluster-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] on behalf of Martin Svec [martin.svec@xxxxxxxx] > >>Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 10:50 AM > >>To: Justin Clift > >>Cc: gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx > >>Subject: Re: Glusterfs 3.4.4 - memory leak in fuse_getxattr > >> > >>Dne 24.6.2014 18:53, Justin Clift napsal(a): > >>>On 24/06/2014, at 5:35 PM, Martin Svec wrote: > >>><snip> > >>>>Note that the patch is 11 months old. Why it isn't merged in 3.4 branch yet? > >>> > >>>Sounds like we just need to backport it to release-3.4 branch then. > >>Thank you, that would be fine :) It's surprising that nobody reported > >>it in 3.4 yet. I was able to crash my 1GB testlab VM in a few minutes > >>(150,000 small files copied to Gluster required more than 800MB of > >>glusterfs process heap). > >> > >>Regards, > >> > >>Martin Svec > >> > >>_______________________________________________ > >>Gluster-users mailing list > >>Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx > >>http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users > >>_______________________________________________ > >>Gluster-users mailing list > >>Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx > >>http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users -- Regards Viktor Villafuerte Optus Internet Engineering t: 02 808-25265 _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
