Re: Brick on just one host constantly going offline

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 11:35 PM, Justin Clift <justin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 03/06/2014, at 3:14 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
>>> From: "Andrew Lau" <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2014 6:42:44 AM
> <snip>
>>> Ah, that makes sense as it was the only volume which had that ping
>>> timeout setting. I also did see the timeout messages in the logs when
>>> I was checking. So is this merged in 3.5.1 ?
>>
>> Yes! http://review.gluster.org/7570
>
>
> Would you have time/inclination to test the 3.5.1 beta?
>
>   http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/qa-releases/3.5.1beta1/
>
> We're really needing people to test it and report back. :)
>

I'll take it for a spin, will it be an easy process to upgrade to the
GA release from beta? Contemplating whether it's worth living life on
the edge and deploying with beta :)

> Regards and best wishes,
>
> Justin Clift
>
> --
> Open Source and Standards @ Red Hat
>
> twitter.com/realjustinclift
>
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users




[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux