On 12/08/2013 07:06 PM, Nguyen Viet Cuong wrote: Thanks for sharing.
Btw, I do believe that GlusterFS 3.2.x is much more stable than 3.4.x in
production.
This is quite contrary to what we have seen in the community. From a
development perspective too, we feel much better about 3.4.1. Are there
specific instances that worked well with 3.2.x which does not work fine
for you in 3.4.x?
987555 - is that fixed in 3.5?
Or did it even make it into 3.4.2
couldn't find a note on that.
Show stopper for moving from
3.2.x to anywhere for me!
cheers
b
Cheers,
Vijay
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
--
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Bernhard Glomm IT Administration
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
Ecologic Institut gemeinnützige GmbH | Pfalzburger Str. 43/44 | 10717 Berlin | Germany GF: R. Andreas Kraemer | AG: Charlottenburg HRB 57947 | USt/VAT-IdNr.: DE811963464 Ecologic™ is a Trade Mark (TM) of Ecologic Institut gemeinnützige GmbH |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
_______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
