On 12/08/2013 07:06 PM, Nguyen Viet Cuong wrote:
Thanks for sharing. Btw, I do believe that GlusterFS 3.2.x is much more stable than 3.4.x in production.
This is quite contrary to what we have seen in the community. From a development perspective too, we feel much better about 3.4.1. Are there specific instances that worked well with 3.2.x which does not work fine for you in 3.4.x?
Cheers, Vijay _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users