Re: Gluster caching behaviour

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Diep,

You can check it out in the slide from Red Hat or conduct the benchmark by yourself which simulates the high-load environment. I saw the positive effects of changing the swappiness and the scheduler for block devices, for example. I will share the benchmark results when I have new storage for testing.

FYI, the enterprise-storage profile for "tuned" will change most of the options mentioned by Lanning as well as other options such as elevator.

Regards,
Cuong


On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Diep Pham Van <imeo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 14:32:32 +0900
Nguyen Viet Cuong <mrcuongnv@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> If you use RHEL 6 or the like, you should consider to install tuned &
> tuned-utils and activate the enterprise-storage profile as the baseline
> before going to more advanced tuning.
Can you provide some benchmark result before and after active
enterprise-storage profile?

--
Diep Pham Van <imeo@xxxxxxxxxx>



--
Nguyen Viet Cuong
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users

[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux