No worries, Greg. Your posts have been fine - don't worry about it. Thanks, JM ----- Original Message ----- > Well?OK. The ?on my own? comment came from me after a long time and a lot of > work trying to figure this out. I just went back and checked ? I posted the > original question on 7/8 at 8:18 PM. I asked a follow-up question 7/9 at > 12:27 PM, roughly 16 hours later. And then the ?On my own? post was on 7/10 > at 12:27 AM, or around 28 hours after my original question. I was feeling > kind of lonely and, well, on my own at the time. All times are USA Central > time. I do work weird hours. > I certainly don?t mean to be a troll and even after all these years, I still > don?t know what a troll is. All I know is, I need help with this issue and I > appreciate the advice so far. And, frankly, without community help solving > or mitigating this problem, I can?t use Gluster for my HA application > because the behavior I observed creates 2 single points of failure instead > of eliminating a single point of failure with redundancy. Which creates a > serious headache and I would think a problem the whole community would want > to overcome. > I gave the best info I know how to give, and I did a bunch of work to try to > characterize the problem and take my application out of the mix. If I can do > more or provide more info, just tell me what I can provide while I have > everything sitting here in a testbed. > My challenge now is, this project was supposed to be delivered several days > ago. I?ll be out of town tomorrow so I may not be able to get back to it > until Saturday. I just don?t feel good delivering this system until I can > test it some more and understand what?s going on with the issue I stumbled > upon. > - Greg > From: Joe Julian [mailto:joe at julianfamily.org] > Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 12:03 PM > To: John Mark Walker > Cc: Brian Candler; Greg Scott; gluster-users at gluster.org > Subject: Re: One node goes offline, the other node can't see > the replicated volume anymore > The trolling is the "you're on your own" bit. We have a very helpful > community. > The only questions that go unanswered on irc are the ones where the asker > left. > On email, I suspect it's when the information provided stumps the readers, or > some people (myself included) tend not to respond when the email has no > information at all. (Not saying his had no info, just cataloging.) > John Mark Walker < johnmark at gluster.org > wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > This is unhelpful and trolling. Please refrain from this behavior. > > Er, not so fast :) > If bad things happen to our users, I want to create the kind of environment > where they feel like they can discuss it openly. Things happen, and we need > to know about it. > The time to crack down would be if someone posts stuff that is off-topic or > continuously rants without acknowledging current efforts. Look, he said it > didn't work for him and he's evaluating other things - I don't have a > problem with that. > I ask only two things in this area: > 1. if future versions attempt to solve your specific issues that you > acknowledge the effort and give it a try. > 2. once you've said your piece, ie. "this doesn't work for me" and you decide > to leave for other pastures, please don't continue to post stuff here that > reflects on old releases and out-of-date information. > -JM > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20130711/a5a36f6a/attachment.html>
