This is unhelpful and trolling. Please refrain from this behavior. Brian Candler <b.candler at pobox.com> wrote: >On 10/07/2013 06:26, Greg Scott wrote: >> >> Bummer. Looks like I'm on my own with this one. >> >I'm afraid this is the problem with gluster: everything works great on >the happy path, but as soon as anything goes wrong, you're stuffed. >There is neither recovery procedure documentation, nor detailled >internals documentation (so you could work out for yourself what is >going on and fix it). In my opinion, gluster is unsupportable in its >current form. > >For this reason I have recently stripped gluster out of a production >network. We're back to using simple NFSv4 at the moment. At some point >I >will be evaluating ceph and maybe swift. > >As you've observed, there's little point in having "resilient" copies >of >data if they are not retrievable in error scenarios. > >Regards, > >Brian. > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >Gluster-users mailing list >Gluster-users at gluster.org >http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20130711/81acc8f8/attachment.html>
