about HA infrastructure for hypervisors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



You should indeed to use the same server running as a storage brick as a KVM host to maximize hardware and power usage. Only thing I am not sure is if you can limit the amount of host memory Gluster can eat so most of it gets reserved for the Virtual Machines.

Fernando

-----Original Message-----
From: gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org [mailto:gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org] On Behalf Of Nicolas Sebrecht
Sent: 28 June 2012 10:31
To: Thomas Jackson
Cc: 'gluster-users'
Subject: Re: about HA infrastructure for hypervisors

The 28/06/12, Thomas Jackson wrote:

> Why don't you have KVM running on the Gluster bricks as well?

Good point. While abtracting we decided to seperate KVM & Gluster but I can't remember why.
We'll think about that again.

> We have a 4 node cluster (each with 4x 300GB 15k SAS drives in 
> RAID10), 10 gigabit SFP+ Ethernet (with redundant switching). Each 
> node participates in a distribute+replicate Gluster namespace and runs 
> KVM. We found this to be the most efficient (and fastest) way to run the cluster.
> 
> This works well for us, although (due to Gluster using fuse) it isn't 
> as fast as we would like. Currently waiting for the KVM driver that 
> has been discussed a few times recently, that should make a huge 
> difference to the performance for us.

Ok! Thanks.

--
Nicolas Sebrecht
_______________________________________________
Gluster-users mailing list
Gluster-users at gluster.org
http://gluster.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users


[Index of Archives]     [Gluster Development]     [Linux Filesytems Development]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux