The 28/06/12, Thomas Jackson wrote: > Why don't you have KVM running on the Gluster bricks as well? Good point. While abtracting we decided to seperate KVM & Gluster but I can't remember why. We'll think about that again. > We have a 4 node cluster (each with 4x 300GB 15k SAS drives in RAID10), 10 > gigabit SFP+ Ethernet (with redundant switching). Each node participates in > a distribute+replicate Gluster namespace and runs KVM. We found this to be > the most efficient (and fastest) way to run the cluster. > > This works well for us, although (due to Gluster using fuse) it isn't as > fast as we would like. Currently waiting for the KVM driver that has been > discussed a few times recently, that should make a huge difference to the > performance for us. Ok! Thanks. -- Nicolas Sebrecht
