I didn't think his message violated any of your rules. Seems to me he has some disagreements with the approach being used to develop Gluster. I think you should listen to people who disagree with you. From monitoring this list for more than a year and tried--unsuccessfully--to put Gluster into production use, I think there are a lot of people who have problems with stability. So please, can you respond to his comments with why his suggestions are invalid? sean On 12/27/2012 03:39 PM, John Mark Walker wrote: > > Stephan, > > I'm going to make this as simple as possible. Every message to this > list should follow these rules: > > 1. be helpful > 2. be constructive > 3. be respectful > > I will not tolerate ranting that serves no purpose. If your message > doesn't follow any of the rules above, then you shouldn't be posting it. > > This is your 2nd warning. > > -JM > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-users mailing list > Gluster-users at gluster.org > http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users -- Sean Fulton GCN Publishing, Inc. Internet Design, Development and Consulting For Today's Media Companies http://www.gcnpublishing.com (203) 665-6211, x203 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20121227/bb82ae80/attachment.html>
