Look, fuse its issues that we all know about. Either it works for you or it doesn't. If fuse bothers you that much, look into libgfapi. Re: NFS - I'm trying to help track this down. Please either add your comment to an existing bug or create a new ticket. Either way, ranting won't solve your problem or inspire anyone to fix it. -JM Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw at ithnet.com> wrote: On Wed, 26 Dec 2012 22:04:09 -0800 Joe Julian <joe at julianfamily.org> wrote: > It would probably be better to ask this with end-goal questions instead > of with a unspecified "critical feature" list and "performance problems". > > 6 months ago, for myself and quite an extensive (and often impressive) > list of users there were no missing critical features nor was there any > problems with performance. That's not to say that they did not meet your > design specifications, but without those specs you're the only one who > could evaluate that. Well, then the list of users does obviously not contain me ;-) The damn thing will only become impressive if a native kernel client module is done. FUSE is really a pain. And read my lips: the NFS implementation has general load/performance problems. Don't be surprised if it jumps into your face. Why on earth do they think linux has NFS as kernel implementation? -- Regards, Stephan _______________________________________________ Gluster-users mailing list Gluster-users at gluster.org http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
