On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 09:21:57 +0100 Brian Candler <B.Candler at pobox.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:01:16AM +0200, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > > Again, let me note two things: > > - the current code has a lot more (other) problems than the 2.X tree, that is > > why we won't use that. > > - if one has to look at the code to find out the basic problem he is not the > > target person of our question. > > To which I would suggest that if such a fundamental problem were known > about, it would have been fixed long ago. > > IMO your best bet is to raise a bug report in bugzilla. It is obvious I cannot do that because the only answer will be to update to a current version and re-file the report if the problem still persists. I am well aware though that the problem is quite fundamental for a fs... -- Regards, Stephan
