On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:01:16AM +0200, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > Again, let me note two things: > - the current code has a lot more (other) problems than the 2.X tree, that is > why we won't use that. > - if one has to look at the code to find out the basic problem he is not the > target person of our question. To which I would suggest that if such a fundamental problem were known about, it would have been fixed long ago. IMO your best bet is to raise a bug report in bugzilla.
