On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Chris Maciejewski <chris at wima.co.uk> wrote: > It seems to me there is a performance problem with GlusterFS 2.0.0rc1. > > Please see the results of the following simple test below: > > $ dd if=/dev/zero of=hundred-meg-file count=100000 bs=1000 > > for 2.0.0.rc1: > 100000+0 records in > 100000+0 records out > 100000000 bytes (100 MB) copied, 283.346 s, 353 kB/s > > for 1.3.12 > 100000+0 records in > 100000+0 records out > 100000000 bytes (100 MB) copied, 3.16986 s, 31.5 MB/s There was a bug in 2.0.0rc1 where the write-behind aggregate size was not being honored. Also, other performance enhancements for replicate are underway and should be available in a couple of weeks. Avati
