On Fri, 3 May 2019 at 14:59, Xavi Hernandez <jahernan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Atin,On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 10:57 AM Atin Mukherjee <amukherj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:I'm bit puzzled on the way coverity is reporting the open defects on GD1 component. As you can see from [1], technically we have 6 open defects and all of the rest are being marked as dismissed. We tried to put some additional annotations in the code through [2] to see if coverity starts feeling happy but the result doesn't change. I still see in the report it complaints about open defect of GD1 as 25 (7 as High, 18 as medium and 1 as Low). More interestingly yesterday's report claimed we fixed 8 defects, introduced 1, but the overall count remained as 102. I'm not able to connect the dots of this puzzle, can anyone?Maybe we need to modify all dismissed CID's so that Coverity considers them again and, hopefully, mark them as solved with the newer updates. They have been manually marked to be ignored, so they are still there...
After yesterday’s run I set the severity for all of them to see if modifications to these CIDs make any difference or not. So fingers crossed till the next report comes :-) .
Just a thought, I'm not sure how this really works.
Same here, I don’t understand the exact workflow and hence seeking additional ideas.
Xavi_______________________________________________
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
- Atin (atinm)
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
