On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 10:33 PM, Shyam Ranganathan <srangana@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 08/09/2018 10:58 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 1:38 AM, Shyam Ranganathan <srangana@xxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:srangana@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> On 08/08/2018 09:04 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote:
> > Today's patch set 7 [1], included fixes provided till last evening IST,
> > and its runs can be seen here [2] (yay! we can link to comments in
> > gerrit now).
> >
> > New failures: (added to the spreadsheet)
> > ./tests/bugs/quick-read/bug-846240.t Heads up Du, failed again with the same pattern in run
>
> The above test fails always if there is a sleep of 10 added at line 36.
>
> I tried to replicate this in my setup, and was able to do so 3/150 times
> and the failures were the same as the ones reported in the build logs
> (as below).
>
> Not finding any clear reason for the failure, I delayed the test (i.e
> added a sleep 10) after the open on M0 to see if the race is uncovered,
> and it was.
>
> Du, request you to take a look at the same, as the test is around
> quick-read but involves open-behind as well.
>
>
> Thanks for that information. I'll be working on this today.
https://build.gluster.org/job/regression-on-demand-full-run/ 46/consoleFull
Sorry Shyam.
I found out the cause [1]. But still thinking about the fix or to remove the test given recent changes to open-behind from [1]. You'll have an answer by EOD today.
>
>
> Failure snippet:
> ----------------
> 23:41:24 [23:41:28] Running tests in file
> ./tests/bugs/quick-read/bug-846240.t
> 23:41:28 ./tests/bugs/quick-read/bug-846240.t ..
> 23:41:28 1..17
> 23:41:28 ok 1, LINENUM:9
> 23:41:28 ok 2, LINENUM:10
> <snip>
> 23:41:28 ok 13, LINENUM:40
> 23:41:28 not ok 14 , LINENUM:50
> 23:41:28 FAILED COMMAND: [ 0 -ne 0 ]
>
> Shyam
>
>
_______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
