On 08/09/2018 10:58 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 1:38 AM, Shyam Ranganathan <srangana@xxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:srangana@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > On 08/08/2018 09:04 PM, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > > Today's patch set 7 [1], included fixes provided till last evening IST, > > and its runs can be seen here [2] (yay! we can link to comments in > > gerrit now). > > > > New failures: (added to the spreadsheet) > > ./tests/bugs/quick-read/bug-846240.t > > The above test fails always if there is a sleep of 10 added at line 36. > > I tried to replicate this in my setup, and was able to do so 3/150 times > and the failures were the same as the ones reported in the build logs > (as below). > > Not finding any clear reason for the failure, I delayed the test (i.e > added a sleep 10) after the open on M0 to see if the race is uncovered, > and it was. > > Du, request you to take a look at the same, as the test is around > quick-read but involves open-behind as well. > > > Thanks for that information. I'll be working on this today. Heads up Du, failed again with the same pattern in run https://build.gluster.org/job/regression-on-demand-full-run/46/consoleFull > > > Failure snippet: > ---------------- > 23:41:24 [23:41:28] Running tests in file > ./tests/bugs/quick-read/bug-846240.t > 23:41:28 ./tests/bugs/quick-read/bug-846240.t .. > 23:41:28 1..17 > 23:41:28 ok 1, LINENUM:9 > 23:41:28 ok 2, LINENUM:10 > <snip> > 23:41:28 ok 13, LINENUM:40 > 23:41:28 not ok 14 , LINENUM:50 > 23:41:28 FAILED COMMAND: [ 0 -ne 0 ] > > Shyam > > _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
