On 03/26/2018 12:33 AM, Aravinda wrote: >>> Also want to propose that, we include a release >>> of http://github.com/gluster/gluster-health-report with 4.1, and make >>> the project more usable. >> In the theme of including sub-projects that we want to highlight, what >> else should we tag a release for or highlight with 4.1? >> >> @Aravinda, how do you envision releasing this with 4.1? IOW, what >> interop tests and hence sanity can be ensured with 4.1 and how can we >> tag a release that is sane against 4.1? > > Some more changes required to make it work with Gluster 4.x, I will work > on fixing those issues and test scripts. > > I have not yet started with Packaging for Fedora/Ubuntu. As of now > available as `pip install`. Let me know if that is fine with 4.1 release. Aravinda, what issue in the gluster-health-report repo should I track for closure? Thanks, Shyam _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
