On 03/02/2018 04:24 AM, Kaushal M wrote: > [snip] > I was able to create libglusterfsd, with just the pmap_signout nad > autoscale functions. > Turned out to be easy enough to do in the end. > I've pushed a patch for review [1] on master. > > I've also opened new bugs to track the fixes for master[2] and > release-4.0[3]. They have been made blockers to the glusterfs-4.0.0 > tracker bug [4]. I really don't like creating this libglusterfsd.so with just two functions to get around this. It feels like a quick-and-dirty hack. (There's never time to do it right, but there's always time to do it over. Except there isn't.) I've posted a change at https://review.gluster.org/19664 that moves those two functions to libgfrpc.so. It works on my f28/rawhide box and the various centos and fedora smoke test boxes. No tricky linker flags, or anything else, required. Regression is running now. (And truth be told I'd like to also move glusterfs_mgmt_pmap_signin() into libgfrpc.so too. Just for (foolish) consistency/symmetry.) > > Shyam, > To backport the fix from master to release-4.0, also requires > backporting one more change [5]. > Would you be okay with backporting that as well, in a single patch? > > [1]: https://review.gluster.org/19657 > [2]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550895 > [3]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1550894 > [4]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539842 > [5]: https://review.gluster.org/19337 > >>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> >>>>>> Kaleb >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Gluster-devel mailing list >>> Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx >>> http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Milind >> > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel > _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@xxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
